🔗 Share this article

Trump’s latest threat to impose an additional 100% tariff on products from China has been called a “typical example” of American hypocrisy, per the Beijing administration.

A representative of the ministry additionally remarked that the nation could introduce its own unspecified “countermeasures” if the American leader executes his threat, adding that the country was “not afraid” of a possible commercial battle.

Last Friday, Trump responded at China’s decision to reinforce its regulations for exports of critical elements, alleging the Chinese leadership of “adopting a confrontational stance” and attempting to hold the global community “under its control”.

Additionally, he warned to cancel a planned meeting with Chinese leader Xi, which was arranged for a meeting in Seoul before the month ends.

His statements on last Friday unsettled stock exchanges, with the S&P 500 share index falling by 2.7%, marking its largest decline since earlier this year.

The president’s words renewed fears of a commercial dispute between the United States and China.

Earlier this year, the respective governments had reached an agreement to remove triple-digit tariffs on each other’s goods, which had created the possibility of trade halting between the economic powers.

This left, United States levies on Chinese goods incurring an extra thirty percent tariff compared with the beginning of 2025, while American products entering the country face a 10% tariff.

The most recent comments from China – released by the Commerce Ministry in the format of written responses to press queries – echoed terminology from the peak of the ongoing trade dispute.

The remarks condemned United States controls on electronic components while justifying China’s own export controls on key elements as “routine measures” to protect domestic safety and that of every country.

Their representative remarked that for “a long time”, the United States had “expanded the interpretation” of state security, misused export control measures and “implemented” discriminatory practices against the Chinese nation.

“Turning to” trade levy ultimatums is not the correct approach to deal with the Chinese government,” their representative said.

“China’s position on a trade conflict has consistently been consistent: we are not seeking one, but we are unafraid of one.”

Recently, Beijing revealed it was reinforcing overseas sale regulations on rare earth minerals and additional substances essential to advanced tech manufacturing.

This was seen as a significant step, as the nation refines about the vast majority of the global rare earth supply, which are employed in products such as photovoltaic modules and mobile phones.

Latest statements from both governments are being viewed by some as a means of strengthening positions ahead of future trade talks.

It is unclear whether a summit between the former president and China’s leader, scheduled at a conference in Seoul later this month, will still proceed.